android.gs
Compare
Blade GT Pro vs Poco X7 Pro

Doogee Blade GT Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What Blade GT Pro does better (6) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade GT Pro

7.7Score

6 advantages≈ $370

Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro

9.1Score

18 advantages≈ $370

Higher score

6.9Display8.9

7.4Camera8.8

6.8Battery7.6

7.6Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GT ProPoco X7 Pro

	Blade GT Pro	Poco X7 Pro	Difference
Height	178.5 mm	160.8 mm	+17.7 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.2 mm	+8.3 mm
Thickness	10.5 mm	8.3 mm	+2.2 mm
Weight	265 g	195 g	+70 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT Pro better than Poco X7 Pro?

Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
Drop resistance classA vs C
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Battery charge cycles1,400 vs 1,000+40%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than Blade GT Pro?

Wired charging18 W vs 90 W5×
OLED panelNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Pro: Yes
Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
Weight265 g vs 195 g+36%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+30%
Max video1080p vs 4K
Energy classE vs C
Pixel density392 ppi vs 446 ppi+14%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Endurance per cycle36 h vs 50 h+38%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade GT Pro≈ $3707.7	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro≈ $3709.1
Design
Weight	265 g	195 g
Thickness	10.5 mm	8.3 mm
Height	178.5 mm	160.8 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Silver	Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.1%	88.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025	Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.25 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score	—	1,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,880
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	—	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	18 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	71%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	E	C
Battery charge cycles	1,400	1,000
Endurance per cycle	36 h	50 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	C