android.gs
Compare
Blade GT Play vs Galaxy S25 FE

Doogee Blade GT Play vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What Blade GT Play does better (4) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (24) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade GT Play

7.4Score

4 advantages≈ $350

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

24 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

6.9Display8.1

5.5Camera9.3

6.8Battery4.8

7.6Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GT PlayGalaxy S25 FE

	Blade GT Play	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	178.5 mm	161.3 mm	+17.2 mm
Width	83.5 mm	76.6 mm	+6.9 mm
Thickness	10.5 mm	7.4 mm	+3.1 mm
Weight	265 g	190 g	+75 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT Play better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+18%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Blade GT Play?

Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
OLED panelNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
Weight265 g vs 190 g+39%
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+28%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
Max video1080p vs 8K

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade GT Play≈ $3507.4	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	265 g	190 g
Thickness	10.5 mm	7.4 mm
Height	178.5 mm	161.3 mm
Width	83.5 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Silver	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.1%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,800 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	18 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	E	B
Battery charge cycles	1,400	2,000
Endurance per cycle	36 h	43 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	A