- android.gs
- Compare
- X20 Pro vs Galaxy A12
Cubot X20 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A12
What X20 Pro does better (5) and where Galaxy A12 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Display2.6
5.4Camera5.3
2.7Battery4.0
2.4Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X20 ProGalaxy A12
| X20 Pro | Galaxy A12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.1 mm | 164 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 240 g | 205 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X20 Pro better than Galaxy A12?
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 270 ppi+51%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+10%
Why is Galaxy A12 better than X20 Pro?
- Main camera12 MP vs 48 MP4×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- NFCNo · X20 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.35 GHz+18%
- Weight240 g vs 205 g+17%
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 157.1 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Colours | Blue, Gold, Black | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 472 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 82.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 107,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.9" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 20% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

