- android.gs
- Compare
- P40 vs Galaxy A12
Cubot P40 vs Samsung Galaxy A12
What P40 does better (4) and where Galaxy A12 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Display2.6
4.9Camera5.3
2.6Battery4.0
5.6Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
P40Galaxy A12
| P40 | Galaxy A12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155 mm | 164 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 205 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P40 better than Galaxy A12?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Weight184 g vs 205 g+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.8% vs 82.1%+3%
Why is Galaxy A12 better than P40?
- Main camera12 MP vs 48 MP4×
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+19%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.35 GHz+31%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · P40: Yes
- Screen size6.2″ vs 6.5″+5%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
- Thickness10 mm vs 8.9 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 155 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Blue, Black, Green | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,520 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 271 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 472 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 82.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.35 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 107,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.9" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 20% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

