android.gs
Compare
KingKong X PRO 5G vs Galaxy S25 FE

Cubot KingKong X PRO 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What KingKong X PRO 5G does better (7) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2025KingKong X PRO 5G

8.5Score

7 advantages≈ $370

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

15 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

7.6Display8.1

7.0Camera9.3

8.6Battery4.8

8.0Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

KingKong X PRO 5GGalaxy S25 FE

	KingKong X PRO 5G	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	175.9 mm	161.3 mm	+14.6 mm
Width	83.3 mm	76.6 mm	+6.7 mm
Thickness	18.3 mm	7.4 mm	+10.9 mm
Weight	392 g	190 g	+202 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is KingKong X PRO 5G better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 4,900 mAh2.1×
Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than KingKong X PRO 5G?

Weight392 g vs 190 g2.1×
OLED panelNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes
NFCNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
CPU frequency2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+60%
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
Thickness18.3 mm vs 7.4 mm2.5×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong X PRO 5G: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot KingKong X PRO 5G≈ $3708.5	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	392 g	190 g
Thickness	18.3 mm	7.4 mm
Height	175.9 mm	161.3 mm
Width	83.3 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP69	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx9	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	—	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	—	385 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	—	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8200	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Mediatek	Exynos
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	—	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	—	No
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	—	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	—	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	10,200 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	—	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	—	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	—	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	—	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A