- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong Star vs Poco F5
Cubot KingKong Star vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What KingKong Star does better (5) and where Poco F5 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display7.6
7.0Camera8.4
8.6Battery5.4
7.6Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong StarPoco F5
| KingKong Star | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 180.2 mm | 161.1 mm | +19.1 mm |
| Width | 80.8 mm | 75 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 7.9 mm | +9.9 mm |
| Weight | 395 g | 181 g | +214 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Star better than Poco F5?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F5: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is Poco F5 better than KingKong Star?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- Weight395 g vs 181 g2.2×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Star: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Star: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Star: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Thickness17.8 mm vs 7.9 mm2.3×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+32%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Star: Yes
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio75% vs 88.9%+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 395 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 17.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 180.2 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 80.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Black/Red | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75% | 88.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
