- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong CS vs Galaxy A12
Cubot KingKong CS vs Samsung Galaxy A12
What KingKong CS does better (1) and where Galaxy A12 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display2.6
3.6Camera5.3
2.9Battery4.0
4.1Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong CSGalaxy A12
| KingKong CS | Galaxy A12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 153 mm | 164 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 75.8 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 8.9 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 236 g | 205 g | +32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong CS better than Galaxy A12?
- Pixel density294 ppi vs 270 ppi+9%
Why is Galaxy A12 better than KingKong CS?
- RAM2 GB vs 6 GB3×
- Main camera13 MP vs 48 MP3.7×
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 128 GB8×
- NFCNo · KingKong CS: Yes
- Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+14%
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2.35 GHz+81%
- Process28 nm vs 12 nm2.3×
- Screen size5″ vs 6.5″+30%
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
- Storage (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong CS: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 236 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 153 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,280 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 294 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 472 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 56.2% | 82.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2.35 GHz |
| GPU | — | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 107,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 20% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | microUSB | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

