- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong Ace 3 vs Poco M6 Pro 4G
Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
What KingKong Ace 3 does better (3) and where Poco M6 Pro 4G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display8.2
7.0Camera8.3
7.1Battery5.2
6.0Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong Ace 3Poco M6 Pro 4G
| KingKong Ace 3 | Poco M6 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.9 mm | 161.1 mm | +12.8 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 75 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Weight | 284 g | 179 g | +105 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Ace 3 better than Poco M6 Pro 4G?
- Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is Poco M6 Pro 4G better than KingKong Ace 3?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight284 g vs 179 g+59%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Ace 3: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 8 mm+59%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.3% vs 88.9%+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 284 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 173.9 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black/Orange | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,053 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.3% | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G88 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 386,301 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,892 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MIUI 14 |
