- android.gs
- Compare
- KingKong Ace 2 vs Hot 50 Pro+ 4G
Cubot KingKong Ace 2 vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro+ 4G
What KingKong Ace 2 does better (3) and where Hot 50 Pro+ 4G wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display8.4
5.2Camera5.2
6.2Battery3.9
6.0Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong Ace 2Hot 50 Pro+ 4G
| KingKong Ace 2 | Hot 50 Pro+ 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.9 mm | 164.1 mm | +9.8 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +7.4 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 6.8 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Weight | 283 g | 162 g | +121 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Ace 2 better than Hot 50 Pro+ 4G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Hot 50 Pro+ 4G: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Hot 50 Pro+ 4G better than KingKong Ace 2?
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Ace 2: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Ace 2: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Weight283 g vs 162 g+75%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 393 ppi+46%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 6.8 mm+87%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 283 g | 162 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 173.9 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 81.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black/Orange, Black/Green | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Dreamy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,190 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 72.7% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 436,283 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,957 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 384 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.9 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 44 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
