android.gs
Compare
A40 vs Galaxy S25 FE

Cubot A40 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What A40 does better (6) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (23) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2025A40

7.3Score

6 advantages

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

23 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

6.6Display8.1

6.4Camera9.3

7.5Battery4.8

6.2Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

A40Galaxy S25 FE

	A40	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	172.3 mm	161.3 mm	+11 mm
Width	78.1 mm	76.6 mm	+1.5 mm
Thickness	8.8 mm	7.4 mm	+1.4 mm
Weight	213 g	190 g	+23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is A40 better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+4%
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
Repairability classB vs C
Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%
Endurance per cycle44 h vs 43 h+3%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than A40?

OLED panelNo · A40: Yes
CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz2×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · A40: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · A40: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · A40: Yes
5GNo · A40: Yes
Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
4K selfie videoNo · A40: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot A407.3	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	213 g	190 g
Thickness	8.8 mm	7.4 mm
Height	172.3 mm	161.3 mm
Width	78.1 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Purple, Titan Grey	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,640 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	260 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	83.5%	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T606	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Unisoc	Exynos
Process	12 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	1.6 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	64 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	—	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	12 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	—	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	C	B
Battery charge cycles	1,300	2,000
Endurance per cycle	44 h	43 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	A	A