- android.gs
- Compare
- S53 vs Pova 4 Pro
Cat S53 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What S53 does better (6) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
3.4Display6.3
5.0Camera4.6
9.1Battery8.2
7.6Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
S53Pova 4 Pro
| S53 | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171 mm | 164.8 mm | +6.2 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 9.2 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Weight | 320 g | 211 g | +109 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S53 better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Wireless chargingYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than S53?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · S53: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · S53: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Weight320 g vs 211 g+52%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 403 ppi+49%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness16 mm vs 9.2 mm+74%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 16 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 171 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 81 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
