- android.gs
- Compare
- Hero 10 vs Razr 50 Ultra
Blackview Hero 10 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
What Hero 10 does better (2) and where Razr 50 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Display9.1
3.8Camera5.7
3.6Battery5.2
3.7Features6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hero 10Razr 50 Ultra
| Hero 10 | Razr 50 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169 mm | 171.4 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.1 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 189 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hero 10 better than Razr 50 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Hero 10?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 165 Hz2.8×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 3,000 nits2.3×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Hero 10: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Hero 10: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Hero 10: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Hero 10: Yes
- eSIMNo · Hero 10: Yes
- Weight198 g vs 189 g+5%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 413 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 169 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Purple | Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,560 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,265 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 84.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,140,567 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,441 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,567 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 72% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -22.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 40 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra7.36.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.96.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra5.06.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.86.9

