- android.gs
- Compare
- BV9300 Pro vs Camon 30 5G
Blackview BV9300 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
What BV9300 Pro does better (6) and where Camon 30 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display8.6
7.7Camera8.0
8.8Battery7.3
6.5Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV9300 ProCamon 30 5G
| BV9300 Pro | Camon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 184.6 mm | 165.4 mm | +19.2 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 75.9 mm | +9.7 mm |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 7.8 mm | +15 mm |
| Weight | 525 g | 199 g | +326 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV9300 Pro better than Camon 30 5G?
- Battery capacity15,080 mAh vs 5,000 mAh3×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30 5G: No
Why is Camon 30 5G better than BV9300 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- Weight525 g vs 199 g2.6×
- OLED panelNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · BV9300 Pro: Yes
- Thickness22.8 mm vs 7.8 mm2.9×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio81% vs 87.5%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 525 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 184.6 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 85.6 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | — | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Emerald Lake Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81% | 87.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 723,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 15,080 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 4.0 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
