- android.gs
- Compare
- BV8800 vs Pova 4 Pro
Blackview BV8800 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What BV8800 does better (7) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display6.3
2.8Performance4.4
6.9Camera4.6
8.5Battery8.2
6.0Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV8800Pova 4 Pro
| BV8800 | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 176.2 mm | 164.8 mm | +11.4 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 9.2 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Weight | 367 g | 211 g | +156 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV8800 better than Pova 4 Pro?
- Battery capacity8,380 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+40%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 450 nits+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than BV8800?
- AnTuTu score254,849 vs 556,5182.2×
- OLED panelNo · BV8800: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · BV8800: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Weight367 g vs 211 g+74%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,752 vs 2,047+17%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min31% vs 62%2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · BV8800: Yes
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 9.2 mm+92%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 367 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 176.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 501 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.9% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 254,849 | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,752 | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,380 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 31% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
