- android.gs
- Compare
- BV8100 vs Camon 30 5G
Blackview BV8100 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
What BV8100 does better (7) and where Camon 30 5G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display8.6
6.8Camera8.0
9.0Battery7.3
7.3Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV8100Camon 30 5G
| BV8100 | Camon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 175.8 mm | 165.4 mm | +10.4 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.9 mm | +5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 18.1 mm | 7.8 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Weight | 360 g | 199 g | +161 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV8100 better than Camon 30 5G?
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+76%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 8 GB32×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 30 5G: No
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 393 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 5G better than BV8100?
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · BV8100: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · BV8100: Yes
- Weight360 g vs 199 g+81%
- Thickness18.1 mm vs 7.8 mm2.3×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio71.5% vs 87.5%+22%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 360 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 18.1 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 175.8 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Green, Orange | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Emerald Lake Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 440 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 71.5% | 87.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 723,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,311 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 67% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
