- android.gs
- Compare
- BL8000 vs Reno12 Pro
Blackview BL8000 vs OPPO Reno12 Pro
What BL8000 does better (4) and where Reno12 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.8
6.8Camera8.4
8.5Battery7.5
8.2Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
BL8000Reno12 Pro
| BL8000 | Reno12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 179.5 mm | 161.5 mm | +18 mm |
| Width | 82.6 mm | 74.8 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 7.4 mm | +9.6 mm |
| Weight | 385 g | 180 g | +205 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BL8000 better than Reno12 Pro?
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+76%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
Why is Reno12 Pro better than BL8000?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Weight385 g vs 180 g2.1×
- OLED panelNo · BL8000: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · BL8000: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · BL8000: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · BL8000: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Thickness17 mm vs 7.4 mm2.3×
- Memory card slotNo · BL8000: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · BL8000: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 385 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 17 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 179.5 mm | 161.5 mm |
| Width | 82.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Celestial Silver, Orbit Grey | Space Brown, Sunset Gold, Nebula Silver, Manish Malhotra |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,380 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | 89.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 681,677 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,625 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 854 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.9 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 78% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 14.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
