- android.gs
- Compare
- A200 Pro vs Poco F5
Blackview A200 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What A200 Pro does better (2) and where Poco F5 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
A200 ProPoco F5
| A200 Pro | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 181 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A200 Pro better than Poco F5?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Memory card slotYes · Poco F5: No
Why is Poco F5 better than A200 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · A200 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · A200 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · A200 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+32%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · A200 Pro: Yes
- Weight196 g vs 181 g+8%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Daybreak Blue, Meteor Purple, Polar Night Black | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 88.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
