How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Phone 9 Pro vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What ROG Phone 9 Pro does better (18) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Asus · 2024ROG Phone 9 Pro
9.5Score
18 advantages≈ $860
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
7 advantages
9.0Display9.4
9.6Performance8.6
9.5Camera8.9
8.5Battery8.6
8.4Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Phone 9 ProiQOO Neo9 Pro
76.8 × 163.88.975.7 × 163.58
ROG Phone 9 ProiQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm+0.3 mm
Width76.8 mm75.7 mm+1.1 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm+0.9 mm
Weight227 g190 g+37 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Phone 9 Pro better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. RAM24 GB vs 12 GB2×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,179 vs 5,445+87%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  4. AnTuTu score3,042,971 vs 2,386,903+27%
  5. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  6. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  7. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  8. Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
  9. Refresh rate185 Hz vs 144 Hz+28%
  10. Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
  11. CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
  12. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than ROG Phone 9 Pro?

  1. Wired charging65 W vs 120 W+85%
  2. Charged in 30 min65% vs 136%2.1×
  3. Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
  4. Weight227 g vs 190 g+19%
  5. Pixel density388 ppi vs 453 ppi+17%
  6. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
  7. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight227 g190 g
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm
Width76.8 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Schott Xensation Up
ColoursPhantom BlackFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,800 px
Pixel density388 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,958 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio88.2%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.32 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
AnTuTu score3,042,9712,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,1795,445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,718—
Memory
RAM24 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,800 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)16.7 h—
Wired charging65 W120 W
Charged in 30 min65%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C (side)USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness-26.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceROG UIFuntouch 14
Major OS updates promised2—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare