How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Phone 8 vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

Asus ROG Phone 8 vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What ROG Phone 8 does better (13) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Phone 8
Asus · 2024ROG Phone 8
9.3Score
13 advantages≈ $3,500
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
8 advantages
9.0Display9.4
8.8Performance8.6
9.4Camera8.9
8.3Battery8.6
7.8Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Phone 8iQOO Neo9 Pro
76.8 × 163.88.975.7 × 163.58
ROG Phone 8iQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm+0.3 mm
Width76.8 mm75.7 mm+1.1 mm
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm+0.9 mm
Weight225 g190 g+35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Phone 8 better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,019 vs 5,445+29%
  6. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+7%
  7. Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
  8. Rear cameras5 vs 22.5×
  9. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  10. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  11. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  12. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than ROG Phone 8?

  1. Wired charging65 W vs 120 W+85%
  2. AnTuTu score2,313,311 vs 2,386,903+3%
  3. Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
  4. Weight225 g vs 190 g+18%
  5. Pixel density388 ppi vs 453 ppi+17%
  6. Charged in 30 min77% vs 136%+77%
  7. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
  8. Thickness8.9 mm vs 8 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ROG Phone 8Asus ROG Phone 8≈ $3,5009.3
Design
Weight225 g190 g
Thickness8.9 mm8 mm
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm
Width76.8 mm75.7 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Schott Xensation Up
ColoursPhantom Black, Rebel GreyFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,800 px
Pixel density388 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,500 nits3,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.2%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,313,3112,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,0195,445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,205—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras52
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging65 W120 W
Charged in 30 min77%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C (side)USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceROG UIFuntouch 14
Major OS updates promised2—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare