How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Phone 8 vs Razr 50 Ultra

Asus ROG Phone 8 vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

What ROG Phone 8 does better (14) and where Razr 50 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Phone 8
Asus · 2024ROG Phone 8
9.3Score
14 advantages≈ $3,500
Higher score
vs
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra
6.9Score
9 advantages≈ $540
9.0Display9.1
8.8Performance5.5
9.4Camera5.7
8.3Battery5.2
7.8Features6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Phone 8Razr 50 Ultra
76.8 × 163.88.974 × 171.47.1
ROG Phone 8Razr 50 UltraDifference
Height163.8 mm171.4 mm−7.6 mm
Width76.8 mm74 mm+2.8 mm
Thickness8.9 mm7.1 mm+1.8 mm
Weight225 g189 g+36 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Phone 8 better than Razr 50 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,313,311 vs 1,140,5672×
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+38%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,019 vs 4,441+58%
  4. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,205 vs 2,5672×
  5. Wired charging65 W vs 45 W+44%
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
  8. Rear cameras5 vs 22.5×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
  10. Max video8K vs 4K
  11. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
  12. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than ROG Phone 8?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  2. Major OS updates promised2 vs 3+50%
  3. 4K selfie videoNo · ROG Phone 8: Yes
  4. eSIMNo · ROG Phone 8: Yes
  5. Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
  6. Weight225 g vs 189 g+19%
  7. Pixel density388 ppi vs 413 ppi+6%
  8. Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.1 mm+25%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ROG Phone 8Asus ROG Phone 8≈ $3,5009.3
Design
Weight225 g189 g
Thickness8.9 mm7.1 mm
Height163.8 mm171.4 mm
Width76.8 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursPhantom Black, Rebel GreySpring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse
Display
Screen size6.8″6.9″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,640 px
Pixel density388 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness2,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio88.2%84.9%
HDRYesYes
Foldable—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 735
AnTuTu score2,313,3111,140,567
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,0194,441
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,2052,567
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras52
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×2×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)—12.1 h
Wired charging65 W45 W
Charged in 30 min77%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C (side)USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-22.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceROG UI—
Major OS updates promised23
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare