Same price ≈ $1,250
- Battery capacity 5,820 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- AnTuTu score 2,202,004 vs 1,991,672
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,700 vs 6,630
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
- Max video 4K vs 8K
- android.gs
- Android phones
- Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Mix Fold 4 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Mix Fold 4
14% cheaper ≈ $1,050
- 4K selfie video
- eSIM
- Max video 4K vs 8K
- Pixel density 402 ppi vs 418 ppi
21% cheaper ≈ $970
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- Wired charging 80 W vs 67 W
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits
- Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
- Wireless charging
10% cheaper ≈ $1,100
- 4K selfie video
- eSIM
- Selfie camera 20 MP vs 16 MP
- AnTuTu score 1,589,991 vs 1,991,672
- Peak brightness 1,800 nits vs 3,000 nits
25% cheaper ≈ $920
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- Measured brightness 1,916 nits vs 1,110 nits
- Wired charging 80 W vs 67 W
- AnTuTu score 1,883,303 vs 1,991,672
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
10% pricier ≈ $1,350
- Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
- AnTuTu score 2,627,421 vs 1,991,672
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
- Max video 4K vs 8K
22% pricier ≈ $1,500
- AnTuTu score 2,256,591 vs 1,991,672
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,651 vs 6,630
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Telephoto camera
76% pricier ≈ $2,150
- Wired charging 100 W vs 67 W
- Measured brightness 2,129 nits vs 1,110 nits
- Battery capacity 5,700 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
- Weight 236 g vs 226 g
42% pricier ≈ $1,750
- AnTuTu score 3,080,707 vs 1,991,672
- Battery capacity 6,660 mAh vs 5,100 mAh
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,871 vs 6,630
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
- Max video 4K vs 8K
34% pricier ≈ $1,650
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,619 vs 6,630
- AnTuTu score 2,197,874 vs 1,991,672
- CPU frequency 4.74 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
- Wired charging 45 W vs 67 W