How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X Fold5 vs Mix Fold 4

Vivo X Fold5 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 4

What X Fold5 does better (8) and where Mix Fold 4 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X Fold5
Vivo · 2025X Fold5
9.0Score
8 advantages≈ $920
vs
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Fold 4
9.2Score
5 advantages≈ $1,250
Higher score
9.4Display8.6
7.8Performance8.1
8.7Camera9.6
9.3Battery9.1
6.0Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

X Fold5Mix Fold 4
142.3 × 159.74.3143.3 × 159.44.6
X Fold5Mix Fold 4Difference
Height159.7 mm159.4 mm+0.3 mm
Width142.3 mm143.3 mm−1 mm
Thickness4.3 mm4.6 mm−0.3 mm
Weight217 g226 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X Fold5 better than Mix Fold 4?

  1. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+18%
  2. Measured brightness1,916 nits vs 1,110 nits+73%
  3. Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
  4. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
  5. Weight217 g vs 226 g+4%
  6. Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  7. Thickness4.3 mm vs 4.6 mm+7%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%

Why is Mix Fold 4 better than X Fold5?

  1. AnTuTu score1,883,303 vs 1,991,672+6%
  2. Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,483 vs 6,630+2%
  4. Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
  5. Wireless charging power40 W vs 50 W+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold5Vivo X Fold5≈ $9209.0
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Xiaomi Mix Fold 4≈ $1,2509.2
Design
Weight217 g226 g
Thickness4.3 mm4.6 mm
Height159.7 mm159.4 mm
Width142.3 mm143.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP58IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
ColoursTitanium Gray, Green, WhiteBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size8″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,200 px2,224 px
Resolution (height)2,480 px2,488 px
Pixel density413 ppi418 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,916 nits1,110 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.9%89.4%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,883,3031,991,672
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,4836,630
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,739—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras34
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)13.3 h—
Wired charging80 W67 W
Charged in 30 min—93%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power40 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.86 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)HyperOS
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare