6% cheaper ≈ $510
- Weight 183 g vs 271 g
- Selfie camera 10 MP vs 4 MP
- Pixel density 425 ppi vs 374 ppi
- Battery capacity 3,300 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
Alternatives to Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Galaxy Z Fold3 5G — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
46% pricier ≈ $790
- Screen-to-body ratio 171.3% vs 88.8%
- Stereo speakers
- Dual SIM
18% cheaper ≈ $440
- Main camera 48 MP vs 12 MP
- Optical zoom 5× vs 2×
- AnTuTu score 859,865 vs 635,918
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,833 vs 12,719
- Weight 283 g vs 271 g
Same price ≈ $530
- Main camera 50 MP vs 12 MP
- Wired charging 44 W vs 25 W
- AnTuTu score 773,574 vs 635,918
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,265 vs 12,719
- Optical stabilisation
24% cheaper ≈ $410
- Main camera 64 MP vs 12 MP
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
- AnTuTu score 675,851 vs 635,918
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,673 vs 12,719
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
Same price ≈ $540
- Main camera 50 MP vs 12 MP
- AnTuTu score 1,140,567 vs 635,918
- Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,441 vs 12,719
- Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,400 mAh
33% pricier ≈ $720
- Main camera 50 MP vs 12 MP
- AnTuTu score 965,260 vs 635,918
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,944 vs 12,719
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx2 vs IPx8
11% pricier ≈ $600
- Main camera 50 MP vs 12 MP
- Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- AnTuTu score 657,381 vs 635,918
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,016 vs 12,719
- Telephoto camera
26% pricier ≈ $680
- AnTuTu score 1,551,239 vs 635,918
- Main camera 50 MP vs 12 MP
- Wired charging 66 W vs 25 W
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,959 vs 12,719
- Wireless charging
29% cheaper ≈ $380
- AnTuTu score 1,200,783 vs 635,918
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 3,495 vs 1,433
- Peak brightness 1,750 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,478 vs 12,719
- RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB