Same price ≈ $820
- Peak brightness 8,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
- Measured brightness 1,766 nits vs 1,107 nits
- Optical zoom 3.5× vs 2.8×
- AnTuTu score 2,221,352 vs 3,274,090
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,970 vs 10,598
- android.gs
- Android phones
- OPPO Find X9s Pro
- Alternatives
Alternatives to OPPO Find X9s Pro
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Find X9s Pro — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Find X9s Pro
5% pricier ≈ $850
- AnTuTu score 4,888,150 vs 3,274,090
- Peak brightness 4,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
- Wired charging 100 W vs 80 W
- Pixel density 419 ppi vs 460 ppi
- Weight 203 g vs 198 g
4% pricier ≈ $840
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- Wired charging 90 W vs 80 W
- Storage (base) 512 GB vs 256 GB
- 4K selfie video
- Weight 208 g vs 198 g
6% pricier ≈ $860
- AnTuTu score 4,627,389 vs 3,274,090
- Battery capacity 9,000 mAh vs 7,025 mAh
- Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Weight 217 g vs 198 g
- Pixel density 450 ppi vs 460 ppi
10% pricier ≈ $890
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- AnTuTu score 4,165,108 vs 3,274,090
- Battery capacity 8,050 mAh vs 7,025 mAh
- 4K video frame rate 60 fps vs 120 fps
- Weight 235 g vs 198 g
7% cheaper ≈ $750
- Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- Refresh rate 185 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Wired charging 100 W vs 80 W
- AnTuTu score 2,596,938 vs 3,274,090
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
4% cheaper ≈ $780
- Peak brightness 3,600 nits vs 1,800 nits
- eSIM
- Screen size 6.6″ vs 6.3″
- Weight 216 g vs 198 g
14% pricier ≈ $920
- AnTuTu score 5,524,187 vs 3,274,090
- Battery capacity 8,800 mAh vs 7,025 mAh
- Wired charging 100 W vs 80 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,929 vs 10,598
12% cheaper ≈ $710
- AnTuTu score 4,288,382 vs 3,274,090
- Battery capacity 8,000 mAh vs 7,025 mAh
- Optical zoom 3.5× vs 2.8×
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Max video 4K vs 8K
21% pricier ≈ $980
- Peak brightness 6,500 nits vs 1,800 nits
- Measured brightness 1,794 nits vs 1,107 nits
- Optical zoom 3.5× vs 2.8×
- AnTuTu score 1,147,970 vs 3,274,090
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,982 vs 10,598