How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Find X9s Pro vs Poco F9 Ultra

OPPO Find X9s Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra

What Find X9s Pro does better (5) and where Poco F9 Ultra wins (11) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Find X9s Pro
OPPO · 2026Find X9s Pro
9.6Score
5 advantages≈ $810
vs
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Ultra
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $890
Higher score
8.8Display9.7
9.6Performance9.6
9.6Camera9.8
9.6Battery9.8
9.3Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Find X9s ProPoco F9 Ultra
71.7 × 150.58.477.9 × 163.58.7
Find X9s ProPoco F9 UltraDifference
Height150.5 mm163.5 mm−13 mm
Width71.7 mm77.9 mm−6.2 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8.7 mm−0.3 mm
Weight198 g235 g−37 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Find X9s Pro better than Poco F9 Ultra?

  1. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  2. Weight198 g vs 235 g+19%
  3. Pixel density460 ppi vs 416 ppi+11%
  4. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
  5. Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.7 mm+4%

Why is Poco F9 Ultra better than Find X9s Pro?

  1. Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 4,500 nits2.5×
  2. AnTuTu score3,274,090 vs 4,165,108+27%
  3. Battery capacity7,025 mAh vs 8,050 mAh+15%
  4. Optical zoom2.8× vs 5×+79%
  5. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 185 Hz+28%
  6. Wired charging80 W vs 100 W+25%
  7. eSIMNo · Find X9s Pro: Yes
  8. Measured brightness1,107 nits vs 1,283 nits+16%
  9. CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
  10. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.9″+9%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight198 g235 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.7 mm
Height150.5 mm163.5 mm
Width71.7 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlue/Green, Orange, Titanium, WhiteBlack, Dark Cherry
Display
Screen size6.3″6.9″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,200 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,608 px
Pixel density460 ppi416 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,107 nits1,283 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%91.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9500Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.21 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 840
AnTuTu score3,274,0904,165,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,59810,500
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.4"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2.8×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,025 mAh8,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—24.6 h
Wired charging80 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—60%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.16
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceColorOS 16.0HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—81 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare