How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. OPPO Find N5
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to OPPO Find N5

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Find N5 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

OPPO Find N5
OPPO · 2025
Find N5
8.1″Snapdragon 8 Elite5,600 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $2,300
9.2

Alternatives to the Find N5

Motorola Razr Fold
1
Motorola · 2026Razr Fold
9.7
Same price ≈ $2,250
  • Peak brightness 6,200 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,342,132 vs 2,274,385
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 5,152 vs 6,215
  • CPU frequency 3.8 GHz vs 4.32 GHz
Vivo X Fold6
2
Vivo · 2026X Fold6
9.4
Same price ≈ $2,250
  • Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Battery capacity 6,900 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • AnTuTu score 2,751,330 vs 2,274,385
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,390 vs 8,218
  • 3DMark Wild Life Extreme 5,090 vs 6,215
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
3
Vivo · 2024X Fold3 Pro
9.3
5% cheaper ≈ $2,150
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Measured brightness 2,129 nits vs 1,188 nits
  • Wired charging 100 W vs 80 W
  • AnTuTu score 2,066,322 vs 2,274,385
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,791 vs 8,218
Honor Magic V6
4
Honor · 2026Magic V6
9.6
23% cheaper ≈ $1,750
  • Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • AnTuTu score 3,080,707 vs 2,274,385
  • Battery capacity 6,660 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • Pixel density 403 ppi vs 412 ppi
  • Screen size 8″ vs 8.1″
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
5
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
9.2
16% cheaper ≈ $1,900
  • Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 11,124 vs 8,218
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
  • Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
Honor Magic V5
6
Honor · 2025Magic V5
9.3
46% cheaper ≈ $1,250
  • Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Battery capacity 5,820 mAh vs 5,600 mAh
  • Selfie camera 20 MP vs 8 MP
  • AnTuTu score 2,202,004 vs 2,274,385
  • Wired charging 66 W vs 80 W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
7
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z TriFold
9.0
38% pricier ≈ $3,100
  • Main camera 200 MP vs 50 MP
  • AnTuTu score 2,926,532 vs 2,274,385
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,710 vs 8,218
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
  • Pixel density 269 ppi vs 412 ppi
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
8
Motorola · 2026Razr 70 Ultra
9.4
34% cheaper ≈ $1,500
  • Peak brightness 5,000 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Active use (test) 16.6 h vs 13.3 h
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Telephoto camera
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
9
Google · 2026Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.6
17% cheaper ≈ $1,900
  • Peak brightness 3,600 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Optical zoom 5× vs 3×
  • Selfie camera 10 MP vs 8 MP
  • Wired charging 30 W vs 80 W
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 5,446 vs 8,218
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
10
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8
8.8
27% cheaper ≈ $1,650
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,619 vs 8,218
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 2,100 nits
  • Active use (test) 14 h vs 13.3 h
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 80 W
  • Telephoto camera
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare