How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Motorola Razr 60
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Motorola Razr 60

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Razr 60 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Motorola Razr 60
Motorola · 2025
Razr 60
6.9″Dimensity 7400X4,500 mAh50 MP
approx. price≈ $700
6.2

Alternatives to the Razr 60

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
1
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7
6.9
14% cheaper ≈ $600
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,433 vs 2,559
  • AnTuTu score 1,513,134 vs 886,677
  • CPU frequency 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 30 W
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
2
Xiaomi · 2025Mix Flip 2
8.7
11% pricier ≈ $780
  • Wired charging 67 W vs 30 W
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Battery capacity 5,165 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • eSIM
  • Weight 199 g vs 188 g
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
3
Google · 2025Pixel 10 Pro Fold
8.5
33% pricier ≈ $930
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,173 vs 2,559
  • AnTuTu score 1,553,009 vs 886,677
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Selfie camera 10 MP vs 32 MP
  • Weight 258 g vs 188 g
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
4
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2
25% cheaper ≈ $530
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,108 vs 2,559
  • AnTuTu score 1,355,845 vs 886,677
  • CPU frequency 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
Motorola Razr 2026
5
Motorola · 2026Razr 2026
7.1
7% pricier ≈ $750
  • Battery capacity 4,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 512 GB
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
6
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
7.8
28% pricier ≈ $900
  • AnTuTu score 1,821,743 vs 886,677
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 10,466 vs 2,559
  • CPU frequency 4.74 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
  • Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 30 W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
7
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Z Fold6
7.3
5% pricier ≈ $730
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,757 vs 2,559
  • AnTuTu score 1,608,744 vs 886,677
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
  • Wired charging 25 W vs 30 W
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
8
Motorola · 2025Razr Ultra 2025
9.0
15% cheaper ≈ $600
  • Wired charging 68 W vs 30 W
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Weight 199 g vs 188 g
  • Main camera aperture f/1.8 vs f/1.7
Vivo X Fold5
9
Vivo · 2025X Fold5
9.0
31% pricier ≈ $920
  • AnTuTu score 1,883,303 vs 886,677
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,483 vs 2,559
  • Wired charging 80 W vs 30 W
  • 4K selfie video
  • eSIM
Xiaomi Mix Flip
10
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Flip
8.1
Same price ≈ $720
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,035 vs 2,559
  • AnTuTu score 1,609,570 vs 886,677
  • Wired charging 67 W vs 30 W
  • Wireless charging
  • Ultra-wide camera
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare