How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Razr 60 vs Galaxy Z Flip8

Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

What Razr 60 does better (7) and where Galaxy Z Flip8 wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Razr 60
Motorola · 2025Razr 60
6.2Score
7 advantages≈ $700
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
7.8Score
13 advantages≈ $900
Higher score
7.2Display6.4
3.5Performance8.2
5.2Camera4.9
5.0Battery5.7
7.8Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 60Galaxy Z Flip8
74 × 171.37.375.4 × 166.96.1
Razr 60Galaxy Z Flip8Difference
Height171.3 mm166.9 mm+4.4 mm
Width74 mm75.4 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness7.3 mm6.1 mm+1.2 mm
Weight188 g180 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 60 better than Galaxy Z Flip8?

  1. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+5%
  2. Wired charging30 W vs 25 W+20%
  3. Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
  4. Repairability classB vs C
  5. Pixel density413 ppi vs 400 ppi+3%
  6. Charged in 30 min61% vs 55%+11%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip8 better than Razr 60?

  1. AnTuTu score886,677 vs 1,821,7432.1×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,559 vs 10,4664.1×
  3. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+82%
  4. Measured brightness1,180 nits vs 1,470 nits+25%
  5. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. Drop resistance classC vs A
  7. Weight188 g vs 180 g+4%
  8. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  9. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
  10. Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 1,200+20%
  11. Thickness7.3 mm vs 6.1 mm+20%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Motorola Razr 60Motorola Razr 60≈ $7006.2
Design
Weight188 g180 g
Thickness7.3 mm6.1 mm
Height171.3 mm166.9 mm
Width74 mm75.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackSilicone polymerGlass
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink, Swarovski editionGraphite, Cream, Pink, Mint
Display
Screen size6.9″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,520 px
Pixel density413 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,180 nits1,470 nits
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%87.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400XQualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz4.74 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW
AnTuTu score886,6771,821,743
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,55910,466
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,916
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.56"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh4,300 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—14.2 h
Wired charging30 W25 W
Charged in 30 min61%55%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.74 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHello UIOne UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classAA
Battery charge cycles1,0001,200
Endurance per cycle45 h44 h
Repairability classBC
Drop resistance classCA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare