How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Android phones
  3. Google Pixel Fold
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Google Pixel Fold

10 foldable phones at a similar price that compete with the Pixel Fold — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the Pixel Fold

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
1
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Z Fold5
6.8
11% pricier ≈ $490
  • AnTuTu score 1,250,358 vs 859,865
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,824 vs 3,833
  • Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
  • Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
2
Tecno · 2024Phantom V Fold2
6.5
Same price ≈ $440
  • Wired charging 70 W vs 30 W
  • AnTuTu score 1,158,040 vs 859,865
  • Battery capacity 5,750 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • Major OS updates promised 2 vs 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6
3
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Z Flip6
6.4
9% cheaper ≈ $400
  • AnTuTu score 1,400,594 vs 859,865
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,265 vs 3,833
  • Peak brightness 2,600 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4
Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra
6.9
23% pricier ≈ $540
  • AnTuTu score 1,140,567 vs 859,865
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 30 W
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
Motorola Razr+ 2024
5
Motorola · 2024Razr+ 2024
7.0
20% cheaper ≈ $350
  • AnTuTu score 1,158,987 vs 859,865
  • Peak brightness 3,000 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Wired charging 45 W vs 30 W
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • Battery capacity 4,000 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
Honor Magic V2
6
Honor · 2023Magic V2
7.6
55% pricier ≈ $680
  • AnTuTu score 1,551,239 vs 859,865
  • Wired charging 66 W vs 30 W
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Optical zoom 2.5× vs 5×
  • Wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
7
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7
6.9
37% pricier ≈ $600
  • AnTuTu score 1,513,134 vs 859,865
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,433 vs 3,833
  • Peak brightness 2,600 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Telephoto camera
  • Battery capacity 4,300 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
8
Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra
9.1
24% pricier ≈ $540
  • AnTuTu score 1,831,189 vs 859,865
  • Wired charging 68 W vs 30 W
  • Peak brightness 4,500 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • Telephoto camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6
9
Samsung · 2024Galaxy Z Fold6
7.3
67% pricier ≈ $730
  • AnTuTu score 1,608,744 vs 859,865
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,757 vs 3,833
  • Storage (max) 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • Battery capacity 4,400 mAh vs 4,821 mAh
  • Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
10
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
6.2
20% pricier ≈ $530
  • AnTuTu score 1,355,845 vs 859,865
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,108 vs 3,833
  • Peak brightness 2,600 nits vs 1,450 nits
  • Optical zoom 2× vs 5×
  • RAM 8 GB vs 12 GB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare