- android.gs
- Compare
- nubia Z40S Pro vs nubia Z50S Pro
ZTE nubia Z40S Pro vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
What nubia Z40S Pro does better (8) and where nubia Z50S Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display9.1
9.8Camera9.6
8.5Battery6.8
8.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
nubia Z40S Pronubia Z50S Pro
| nubia Z40S Pro | nubia Z50S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.9 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 228 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is nubia Z40S Pro better than nubia Z50S Pro?
- Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Optical zoom5× vs 3.3×+52%
- RAM18 GB vs 16 GB+12%
- Weight205 g vs 228 g+11%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.3 mm+2%
Why is nubia Z50S Pro better than nubia Z40S Pro?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,200 nits+20%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 452 ppi+14%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Silicone polymer |
| Colours | Interstellar Black, Star Black, Silver | Black, Khaki, Silver/White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3.36 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,650,939 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,569 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 18 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3.3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MyOS 13 | MyOS 13 |
