- android.gs
- Compare
- Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs nubia Z50S Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
What Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition does better (7) and where nubia Z50S Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display9.1
9.6Camera9.6
7.4Battery6.8
9.0Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Axon 40 Ultra Space Editionnubia Z50S Pro
| Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | nubia Z50S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 204 g | 228 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better than nubia Z50S Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- RAM18 GB vs 16 GB+12%
- Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 1,200 nits+25%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight204 g vs 228 g+12%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 3.3×+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.9% vs 89.3%+4%
Why is nubia Z50S Pro better than Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 452 ppi+13%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+12%
- Resolution (width)1,116 px vs 1,260 px+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 204 g | 228 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Ceramic | Silicone polymer |
| Colours | Black | Black, Khaki, Silver/White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,116 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,029 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.9% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.36 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,650,939 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,569 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 18 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 3.3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MyOS 12 | MyOS 13 |
