- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi Note 15 vs nubia Neo 5 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
What Redmi Note 15 does better (12) and where nubia Neo 5 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display8.6
8.6Camera6.1
7.6Battery8.9
7.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi Note 15nubia Neo 5 Pro
| Redmi Note 15 | nubia Neo 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 166.1 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 78.8 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 210 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than nubia Neo 5 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Weight178 g vs 210 g+18%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.5 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 85.3%+5%
Why is nubia Neo 5 Pro better than Redmi Note 15?
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- Battery capacity5,520 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- eSIMNo · Redmi Note 15: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,524 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 85.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Unisoc T9100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 637,266 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,958 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 861 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,520 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 14.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | MyOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 158.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 28.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

