- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi K90 Ultra vs nubia Neo 5 GT
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 GT
What Redmi K90 Ultra does better (17) and where nubia Neo 5 GT wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
9.0Camera6.1
9.6Battery9.0
9.3Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K90 Ultranubia Neo 5 GT
| Redmi K90 Ultra | nubia Neo 5 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.8 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 227 g | 200 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K90 Ultra better than nubia Neo 5 GT?
- Battery capacity8,550 mAh vs 6,210 mAh+38%
- Peak brightness9,500 nits vs 4,500 nits2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 5 GT: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+66%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 GT: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is nubia Neo 5 GT better than Redmi K90 Ultra?
- eSIMNo · Redmi K90 Ultra: Yes
- Weight227 g vs 200 g+14%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Yellow, Gray, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 447 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 9,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,233,695 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,224 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,550 mAh | 6,210 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 3 | MyOS 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 74 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
