- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi K90 Max vs Redmi Turbo 5
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5
What Redmi K90 Max does better (11) and where Redmi Turbo 5 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.9
9.6Performance8.8
9.0Camera8.8
9.6Battery9.5
9.3Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K90 MaxRedmi Turbo 5
| Redmi K90 Max | Redmi Turbo 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 157.5 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.2 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 227 g | 204 g | +23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K90 Max better than Redmi Turbo 5?
- AnTuTu score3,760,662 vs 2,192,322+72%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,402 vs 6,866+52%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity8,550 mAh vs 7,540 mAh+13%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+24%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is Redmi Turbo 5 better than Redmi K90 Max?
- Weight227 g vs 204 g+11%
- Pixel density447 ppi vs 460 ppi+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.5+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 157.5 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Dragon Crystal Glass | — |
| Colours | Silver, Blue, Black | Asphalt Black, Nitro Blue, Turbo White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,268 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,756 px |
| Pixel density | 447 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,500 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.21 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 | Mali-G720 MC8 |
| AnTuTu score | 3,760,662 | 2,192,322 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,402 | 6,866 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,422 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,550 mAh | 7,540 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
