- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi K50 Pro vs Axon 40 Ultra
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
What Redmi K50 Pro does better (5) and where Axon 40 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display8.7
8.6Camera9.6
7.8Battery6.9
6.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K50 ProAxon 40 Ultra
| Redmi K50 Pro | Axon 40 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 163.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 204 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K50 Pro better than Axon 40 Ultra?
- Wired charging120 W vs 65 W+85%
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Pixel density526 ppi vs 400 ppi+31%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,116 px+29%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
Why is Axon 40 Ultra better than Redmi K50 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Redmi K50 Pro: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 1,500 nits+25%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 92.9%+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 201 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Black, Gold, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,116 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 680 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 92.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 884,923 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,189 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 158% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 13 | MyOS 13 |
