- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi K40 Pro+ vs Axon 30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ vs ZTE Axon 30 5G
What Redmi K40 Pro+ does better (9) and where Axon 30 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display9.4
8.3Camera7.8
4.2Battery4.8
7.0Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K40 Pro+Axon 30 5G
| Redmi K40 Pro+ | Axon 30 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 170.2 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm | = |
| Weight | 196 g | 189 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K40 Pro+ better than Axon 30 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Stereo speakersYes · Axon 30 5G: No
- Battery capacity4,520 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+8%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.9% vs 80.8%+6%
Why is Axon 30 5G better than Redmi K40 Pro+?
- Wired charging33 W vs 65 W+97%
- Memory card slotNo · Redmi K40 Pro+: Yes
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+13%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+4%
- Weight196 g vs 189 g+4%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 170.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Aurora | Black, Aqua |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 438 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 80.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 701,991 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,160 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,520 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 12 | MyOS 11 |
