- android.gs
- Compare
- Redmi A4 vs Blade V70 Design
Xiaomi Redmi A4 vs ZTE Blade V70 Design
What Redmi A4 does better (4) and where Blade V70 Design wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display6.0
4.1Camera5.5
6.3Battery5.1
3.8Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi A4Blade V70 Design
| Redmi A4 | Blade V70 Design | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.9 mm | 165.8 mm | +6.1 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 77.1 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 212 g | 206 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi A4 better than Blade V70 Design?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+3%
Why is Blade V70 Design better than Redmi A4?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Redmi A4: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging18 W vs 22 W+25%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 16 MP3.2×
- Weight212 g vs 206 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 171.9 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | Sparkle Purple, Starry Black | Stone gray, Rose pink, Citrus orange, Jade green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,640 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 491,371 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,899 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.81 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 41 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
