- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco X4 GT vs Axon 30S
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs ZTE Axon 30S
What Poco X4 GT does better (8) and where Axon 30S wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display9.4
7.2Camera7.8
8.0Battery4.3
6.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco X4 GTAxon 30S
| Poco X4 GT | Axon 30S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 170.2 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77.8 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 189 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco X4 GT better than Axon 30S?
- Battery capacity5,080 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+21%
- Stereo speakersYes · Axon 30S: No
- Wired charging67 W vs 55 W+22%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Axon 30S: No
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.1% vs 80.8%+5%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Axon 30S better than Poco X4 GT?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Poco X4 GT: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Poco X4 GT: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+12%
- Weight200 g vs 189 g+6%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 170.2 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 650 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 80.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.85 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 747,871 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,719 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,518 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,080 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.6 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 13 for POCO | MyOS 12 |
