- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco M8 vs nubia A77
Xiaomi Poco M8 vs ZTE nubia A77
What Poco M8 does better (16) and where nubia A77 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco M8nubia A77
| Poco M8 | nubia A77 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 168 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 193 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco M8 better than nubia A77?
- Wired charging45 W vs 22 W2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- OLED panelYes · nubia A77: No
- Stereo speakersYes · nubia A77: No
- Battery capacity5,520 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 265 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight178 g vs 193 g+8%
Why is nubia A77 better than Poco M8?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco M8: Yes
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Silver | Obsidian Black, Glacier White, Twilight Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 265 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,473 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 83.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 631,693 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,898 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 866 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,520 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 13.9 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
