- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco M8 Power vs nubia Neo 5
Xiaomi Poco M8 Power vs ZTE nubia Neo 5
What Poco M8 Power does better (9) and where nubia Neo 5 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display7.0
4.6Camera6.1
9.0Battery8.4
8.0Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco M8 Powernubia Neo 5
| Poco M8 Power | nubia Neo 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.7 mm | 166.1 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 79.1 mm | 78.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 225 g | 210 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco M8 Power better than nubia Neo 5?
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 6,050 mAh+32%
- OLED panelYes · nubia Neo 5: No
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,000 nits+80%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Pixel density375 ppi vs 314 ppi+19%
- Screen size7″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 900 px+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is nubia Neo 5 better than Poco M8 Power?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- eSIMNo · Poco M8 Power: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco M8 Power: Yes
- Weight225 g vs 210 g+7%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 225 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 169.7 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 79.1 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Black, Green, Blaze Orange | Black, White, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 900 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,396 px | 1,940 px |
| Pixel density | 375 ppi | 314 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4% | 87% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 | Unisoc T9300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 611,651 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,328 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 3 | MyOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
