How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F9 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+

What Poco F9 Ultra does better (7) and where nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+ wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Ultra
9.7Score
7 advantages≈ $890
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $1,000
9.7Display9.8
9.6Performance9.8
9.8Camera8.9
9.8Battery9.8
9.5Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F9 Ultranubia RedMagic 12 Pro+
77.9 × 163.58.776 × 1638.6
Poco F9 Ultranubia RedMagic 12 Pro+Difference
Height163.5 mm163 mm+0.5 mm
Width77.9 mm76 mm+1.9 mm
Thickness8.7 mm8.6 mm+0.1 mm
Weight235 g223 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F9 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+: No
  3. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  4. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+: No
  5. eSIMYes · nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+: No
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%

Why is nubia RedMagic 12 Pro+ better than Poco F9 Ultra?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,500 vs 13,894+32%
  2. AnTuTu score4,165,108 vs 4,541,625+9%
  3. Battery capacity8,050 mAh vs 8,400 mAh+4%
  4. Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F9 Ultra: Yes
  6. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 5,000 nits+11%
  7. CPU frequency4.6 GHz vs 5.01 GHz+9%
  8. Weight235 g vs 223 g+5%
  9. Pixel density416 ppi vs 431 ppi+4%
  10. Wireless charging power50 W vs 80 W+60%
  11. Process3 nm vs 2 nm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight235 g223 g
Thickness8.7 mm8.6 mm
Height163.5 mm163 mm
Width77.9 mm76 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlack, Dark CherryNightfreeze (Transparent Black), Subzero (Transparent Silver), Skyfrost (Blue Transparent)
Display
Screen size6.9″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,200 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,608 px2,688 px
Pixel density416 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,283 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio91.6%91.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm2 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.6 GHz5.01 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 850
AnTuTu score4,165,1084,541,625
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,50013,894
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,050 mAh8,400 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)24.6 h—
Wired charging100 W120 W
Charged in 30 min60%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W80 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-26.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 17
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 3Redmagic OS 12
Major OS updates promised4—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle81 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classC—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare