How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F7 vs nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)

Xiaomi Poco F7 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)

What Poco F7 does better (9) and where nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7
9.3Score
9 advantages≈ $620
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)
9.5Score
8 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
9.4Display9.7
8.8Camera8.9
8.6Battery9.4
9.3Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F7nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)
77.9 × 163.18.276.5 × 163.88.9
Poco F7nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)Difference
Height163.1 mm163.8 mm−0.7 mm
Width77.9 mm76.5 mm+1.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight216 g230 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F7 better than nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China)?

  1. Peak brightness3,200 nits vs 2,000 nits+60%
  2. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  3. Weight216 g vs 230 g+7%
  4. Pixel density447 ppi vs 431 ppi+4%
  5. Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.9+27%
  6. Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  7. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
  8. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
  9. Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,216 px+5%

Why is nubia RedMagic 11 Pro (China) better than Poco F7?

  1. Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+23%
  2. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+43%
  5. Max video4K vs 8K
  6. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F7: Yes
  7. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  8. Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F7Xiaomi Poco F7≈ $6209.3
Design
Weight216 g230 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm
Height163.1 mm163.8 mm
Width77.9 mm76.5 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i—
ColoursBlack, White, Cyber SilverBlack, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,772 px2,688 px
Pixel density447 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,200 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,525 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.2%90.7%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.21 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 825Adreno 840
AnTuTu score2,024,751—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,402—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,476—
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.5f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera20 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,500 mAh8,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)14.8 h—
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min80%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-26.2 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 2—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles1,000—
Endurance per cycle64 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classD—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare