How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F6 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 9S Pro

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 9S Pro

What Poco F6 Pro does better (11) and where nubia RedMagic 9S Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6 Pro
8.7Score
11 advantages≈ $750
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 9S Pro
9.4Score
7 advantages≈ $770
Higher score
9.2Display8.7
8.1Performance8.6
8.9Camera8.9
5.2Battery9.2
7.3Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F6 Pronubia RedMagic 9S Pro
75 × 160.98.276.4 × 1648.9
Poco F6 Pronubia RedMagic 9S ProDifference
Height160.9 mm164 mm−3.1 mm
Width75 mm76.4 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight209 g229 g−20 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F6 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 9S Pro?

  1. Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,600 nits2.5×
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 80 W+50%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Pixel density526 ppi vs 400 ppi+31%
  5. Measured brightness1,203 nits vs 1,058 nits+14%
  6. Charged in 30 min158% vs 86%+84%
  7. Weight209 g vs 229 g+10%
  8. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,116 px+29%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  10. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
  11. Loudspeaker loudness-24.8 LUFS vs -26.3 LUFS+-6%

Why is nubia RedMagic 9S Pro better than Poco F6 Pro?

  1. Active use (test)10.5 h vs 17.1 h+63%
  2. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+30%
  3. AnTuTu score1,287,854 vs 1,631,366+27%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,859 vs 6,403+32%
  5. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F6 Pro: Yes
  6. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+6%
  7. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight209 g229 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm
Height160.9 mm164 mm
Width75 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlack, WhiteDesign Sleet (Black Version), Snowfall (Silver Version), Cyclone (Transparent Black Version), Frost (White Version)
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,480 px
Pixel density526 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness1,203 nits1,058 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89%89.1%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,287,8541,631,366
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,8596,403
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—5,429
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)10.5 h17.1 h
Wired charging120 W80 W
Charged in 30 min158%86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.8 LUFS-26.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOSRedmagic OS 9.5
Major OS updates promised3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare