How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Poco F6 Pro vs nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+

What Poco F6 Pro does better (7) and where nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+ wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6 Pro
8.7Score
7 advantages≈ $750
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+
8.8Score
6 advantages≈ $760
Higher score
9.2Display8.9
8.9Camera7.8
5.2Battery7.8
7.3Features9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F6 Pronubia RedMagic 8S Pro+
75 × 160.98.276.4 × 1648.9
Poco F6 Pronubia RedMagic 8S Pro+Difference
Height160.9 mm164 mm−3.1 mm
Width75 mm76.4 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight209 g230 g−21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F6 Pro better than nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+?

  1. Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
  2. Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+: No
  3. Pixel density526 ppi vs 400 ppi+31%
  4. Weight209 g vs 230 g+10%
  5. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,116 px+29%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  7. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%

Why is nubia RedMagic 8S Pro+ better than Poco F6 Pro?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Wired charging120 W vs 165 W+38%
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F6 Pro: Yes
  4. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+5%
  5. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  6. Charged in 30 min158% vs 214%+35%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight209 g230 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm
Height160.9 mm164 mm
Width75 mm76.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlack, WhiteMidnight, Platinum, Aurora
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,480 px
Pixel density526 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,000 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness1,203 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89%89.1%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,287,854—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,859—
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.55"1/1.57"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)10.5 h—
Wired charging120 W165 W
Charged in 30 min158%214%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2 (China)
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOSRedMagic OS 8.0
Major OS updates promised3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare