- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco F4 vs Redmi Note 11T Pro
Xiaomi Poco F4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro
What Poco F4 does better (8) and where Redmi Note 11T Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Display7.0
9.1Camera7.2
5.5Battery8.0
6.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco F4Redmi Note 11T Pro
| Poco F4 | Redmi Note 11T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 163.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco F4 better than Redmi Note 11T Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 11T Pro: No
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 650 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 11T Pro: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+12%
- Weight195 g vs 200 g+3%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+16%
Why is Redmi Note 11T Pro better than Poco F4?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,080 mAh+13%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F4: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 407 ppi+3%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green | Blue, Silver, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,003 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.6% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 590,961 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,190 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,232 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 14.2 for POCO | MIUI 13 |
