- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco C85 vs Blade V80 Pro
Xiaomi Poco C85 vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro
What Poco C85 does better (6) and where Blade V80 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display6.8
4.6Camera6.2
7.8Battery5.1
5.4Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco C85Blade V80 Pro
| Poco C85 | Blade V80 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.2 mm | 166 mm | +7.2 mm |
| Width | 81.1 mm | 79 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 211 g | 195 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco C85 better than Blade V80 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 22 W+47%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.8″+2%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Blade V80 Pro better than Poco C85?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 317 ppi+25%
- Peak brightness810 nits vs 1,000 nits+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight211 g vs 195 g+8%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 900 px+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.8% vs 85.6%+5%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 211 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 173.2 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 81.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Mystic Purple, Spring Green, Power Black | White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 900 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,940 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 317 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 810 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 85.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T7280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 602,813 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,575 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
