- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco C85 4G vs nubia Neo 3
Xiaomi Poco C85 4G vs ZTE nubia Neo 3
What Poco C85 4G does better (6) and where nubia Neo 3 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Display7.1
4.6Camera5.5
7.8Battery7.8
5.4Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco C85 4Gnubia Neo 3
| Poco C85 4G | nubia Neo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.6 mm | 168.3 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 76.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 209 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco C85 4G better than nubia Neo 3?
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Drop resistance classA vs D
- Endurance per cycle78 h vs 61 h+28%
- Battery charge cycles1,000 vs 800+25%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%
Why is nubia Neo 3 better than Poco C85 4G?
- Stereo speakersNo · Poco C85 4G: Yes
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 386 ppi+52%
- Peak brightness810 nits vs 1,000 nits+23%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Repairability classC vs B
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 86.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 171.6 mm | 168.3 mm |
| Width | 79.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Purple, Black, Green | Shadow Black, Cyber Silver, Titanium Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 810 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 639,225 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,073 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 78 h | 61 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | D |









