- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco C65 vs Blade A53 Pro
Xiaomi Poco C65 vs ZTE Blade A53 Pro
What Poco C65 does better (13) and where Blade A53 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display3.2
4.6Camera2.7
3.1Battery3.5
5.0Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco C65Blade A53 Pro
| Poco C65 | Blade A53 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 164 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 75.8 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco C65 better than Blade A53 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Process12 nm vs 22 nm+83%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 4.2+26%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Blade A53 Pro better than Poco C65?
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 269 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Purple | Dark Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 607 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 82.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Unisoc SC9863A1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 22 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | IMG8322 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,885 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,201 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 11.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 28% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -31.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
