- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco C61 vs Blade A75
Xiaomi Poco C61 vs ZTE Blade A75
What Poco C61 does better (5) and where Blade A75 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco C61Blade A75
| Poco C61 | Blade A75 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.4 mm | 163.6 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 74.9 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco C61 better than Blade A75?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Memory card slotYes · Blade A75: No
- Weight199 g vs 206 g+3%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.6 mm+4%
Why is Blade A75 better than Poco C61?
- Main camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- Wired charging10 W vs 18 W+80%
- 5GNo · Poco C61: Yes
- NFCNo · Poco C61: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 86%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 168.4 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Green | Black, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,650 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G36 | Unisoc T760 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 187,715 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 848 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.84 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI | — |
