- android.gs
- Compare
- Black Shark 4S Pro vs nubia RedMagic 6s Pro
Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 6s Pro
What Black Shark 4S Pro does better (5) and where nubia RedMagic 6s Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display8.4
8.0Camera7.7
6.6Battery8.5
8.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Black Shark 4S Pronubia RedMagic 6s Pro
| Black Shark 4S Pro | nubia RedMagic 6s Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 169.9 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.2 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 215 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Black Shark 4S Pro better than nubia RedMagic 6s Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 700 nits+86%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min300% vs 176%+70%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 387 ppi+2%
Why is nubia RedMagic 6s Pro better than Black Shark 4S Pro?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,050 mAh+12%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- RAM16 GB vs 18 GB+12%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Weight220 g vs 215 g+2%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 169.9 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, White | Eclipse Black, Transparent, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 529 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 85.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 758,329 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 14,612 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 18 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 300% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -21.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, heart rate |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI | — |
